I always knew our agricultural needs influenced our school calendars, with their long breaks to allow children to help on the family farm. What I’d never considered was the influence of the metaphor of the North American growth cycle, and how it explains why the tradition of a long summer vacation is still with us in the U.S. long after the family farm is mostly a thing of the past.

I’ve been reading Micheal Gladwell’s Outliers. In Chapter Nine, Gladwell briefly relays the history of the development of the public education system in America. Early on, basic literacy was considered essential, as informed citizens are necessary for a democracy to thrive. But what, exactly, should educating our children entail? Gladwell cites a number of sources that indicate nineteenth century educators were considering not just economic concerns, but that too much study could lead to an over-stimulated mind and mental disorders. Saturday classes were cut, and long school days and short vacations were adjusted to give students more rest.

Gladwell concludes that the metaphor being applied was that “effort must be balanced by rest”—just as fields rest in winter, and may need to lie fallow for a season to recoup. “We formulate new ideas by analogy, working from what we know toward what we don’t know, and what reformers knew were the rhythms of the agricultural seasons.” (p.254) Gladwell draws a contrast to the parts of Asia dominated by rice paddy agriculture and its rhythms. Planting two or three crops a year, rice farmers had no prolonged periods of rest. Nutrient-rich water used for irrigation enriches the soil, so the more it is cultivated, the better for the soil—unlike wheat or cotton crops. There developed, then, no guiding metaphor that suggests rest is good for the growing mind—and Japanese children, for example, go to school 243 days per year compared with 180 days for American children!

What Gladwell gives us is an example of the way metaphors can structure our thinking. “We formulate new ideas by analogy, working from what we know toward what we don’t know…” Yes, by analogy—by metaphor. A growing child is like a cultivated field, we think. Sic, what we know about cultivating crops can be applied to children. Utterly subconsciously, we can come to such conclusions, and they can limit our ideas about what might be possible or undermine our willingness to be open to new ways of doing things.

It’s precisely this sort of metaphorical sub-structure that can emerge with a Symbolic Modeling session. When I think about “effort must be balanced by rest”, I notice the implied metaphor in the word “balanced”. It’s a word that comes up frequently in client sessions, usually as something the client wants more of. My clients are far more likely to have an underlying belief that they are allowed to rest only when sick or completely exhausted than to think they rest too much. So, who is doing the allowing to rest, or not allowing, as the case may be? “Ah, interesting question,” the client usually replies. And then we are off, hunting for the guiding metaphor!

I read an article today that suggests a specific and interesting application of Clean Language skills entitled “Diagnosis: What Doctors Are Missing’,  by Jerome Groopman. He describes the prevalence today of doctors diagnosing and determining treatments based on test results—lots of them—rather than on interviewing the actual patient. Groopman says,

“The most seasoned clinicians teach that the patient tells you his diagnosis if only you know how to listen. The clinical history, beyond all other aspects of information gathering, hold the most clues. And it is this part of medicine–the patient’s narrative, the onset and tempo of the illness, the factors that exacerbated the symptoms and those that ameliorated them, the foods the patient ate, the clothes he wore, the people he worked with, the trips he took, the myriad of other events that occurred before, during, and after the malady–that are as vital as any DNA analysis or MRI investigation.”                                           New York Times Book Review, Nov. 5, 2009, Vol. LVI, No. 17

 Groopman quotes research that concluded that misdiagnoses often occur because of false assumptions the doctors made that set them on the wrong track. And once they were on it, they were no longer as attentive to other possibilities.

“We most need a discerning doctor when a diagnosis is not obvious, when the clues are confusing, when initial test are inconclusive. No simple technology can serve as a surrogate for the probing human mind.”

And a probing mind is well-served by learning Clean Language—a questioning process that uses primarily the patient’s exact words and keeps the facilitator’s  (in this case the doctor’s) assumptions to a minimum. When a doctor learns to repeat a patient’s exact words, s/he learns to listen with precision, and will notice things that others readily miss. S/he’ll be surprised to learn how much knowing there is in a patient’s word choice, often just below the patient’s conscious awareness.  The Clean Language process zooms attention in on details and zooms attention out to the larger context; new information can emerge very quickly. Clean Language can be used to explore and clarify, to sequence events or symptoms, and to explore what’s important to the patient, both in terms of treatment and life style issues, to name but a few uses. 

Of course, they aren’t the only questions or approach a doctor might use, but learning to listen this way, training to recognize one’s assumptions, and developing a way to engage with a patient that makes the patient feel truly heard and respected and  elicit meaningful information  are skills that could enhance the effectiveness of any doctor.

Visit my website to learn more about Clean Language http://www.miningyourmetaphors.com/ . Want to learn Clean Language? Contact me at gina@miningyourmetaphors.com for more information. Next training: Nov. 1-2, 2009 Level I and Nov. 3-7,  Level II.

   I’ve recently returned from London , where I was doing advanced training in Symbolic Modeling and attending the Clean Conference 2009, a gathering of people from around the world sharing their work with and thoughts about Clean Language.   Surprisingly, one of my lessons came not from my classes nor the Conference, but from walking around London. 

   Being American and used to driving on the right, it was a challenge to manage there, where they drive on the left. Forget trying to drive a car; just crossing the street was difficult!    My crowning moment was when fellow trainee Dena Robbins-Deckel (who is from Israel, where they also drive on the right) and I approached a crosswalk. There on the street, painted in large letters, was LOOK RIGHT. I stopped, mindfully tell myself, “Okay now. I have to do the opposite of what I instinctively do.”  Dena was pausing, staring, concentrating, no doubt going through a similar mental process. So what do we do? We both looked left.  And then, at the same moment, we said, “Which way is right?” Our brains were positively scrambled by the effort to change!

   Besides giving us a good laugh at ourselves, the incident provided a wonderful demonstration of just how difficult it is to overcome patterns of behavior that repetition has firmly established in our brains, despite cognitive awareness and the intention to do something differently.   If you’ve ever found yourself wanting to change your behavior, fully intending to, but finding you just can’t seem to, you know what I mean. And insight into why it might be hard or where your behavior came from in the first place doesn’t help much either.

   Something has to change in both mind and body, where old patterns are deeply entrenched. I’ve found Symbolic Modeling is one effective way of doing that, using the language of the unconscious: metaphor.  Where most verbal techniques engage your cognitive faculties, the slightly altered state feel of a Symbolic Modeling session is taping into a different kind of knowing and processing. It bypasses your ‘logical’ knowing and self-limiting beliefs to enable your brain to “do something differently”, bringing about change (if that’s what you want) on an internal level that transcends cognitive awareness and those well-established patterns. Want to learn more about this technique? Check out my website www.miningyourmetaphors.com

As for crossing the streets in London, I gave up trying to retrain myself entirely, and just looked both ways wherever I was!

Gina

How Do Horseshoes and Clean Language Differ?

     At our last summer hurrah at the beach, our family was playing horseshoes, and it got me thinking.  In horseshoes, close just may be good enough. But when you use Clean Language and asking questions about your clients’ statements, you have to use their exact words.

     Why isn’t close-but-not-exact good enough?

     Try this. Take a piece of paper, and list the numbers 1-10. Consider the word ‘green.’ Write down the first ten things that come to mind related to ‘green.’  Then, without sharing your answers, ask a few other people to do the same. Now, compare lists.

     Chances are you may have several words that are the same and then a few more that are only on your list but it’s logical to everyone why they made your list.  And then perhaps there are one or two words that leave your friends scratching their heads: why would that have anything to do with ‘green?  Maybe the word ‘grandmother’ because green was your grandmother’s favorite color, or ‘icing’ because someone once made you a funny birthday cake with green icing. The association is unique to you.

    And that’s why close is not good enough when you’re repeating your clients’ words. Because every word, consciously or subconsciously, has its own resonance and associations for the speaker. Change it, and you lose the information that word ‘contains’….and you suggest to your client you didn’t really hear him/her.

    Share your story here on the blog of a unique association you have with a word or respond to someone else’s word-story with your association.    

     And the next time someone uses the word “green”, you might want to use a Clean Language question, and ask, “What kind of green is that green?”

Welcome to Metaphorum!  Here you’ll find updates from me about the latest happenings in the Mining Your Metaphors world, thoughts and theories about metaphors and Symbolic Modeling, suggestions for applications of the technique,  quotes, poems and more. I hope you’ll find them stimulating.

Whether you’re a client exploring the possibilities of Symbolic Modeling, a potential trainee considering adding Symbolic Modeling  to your tool box, or someone already familiar with Symbolic Modeling who’s ever curious about the ways transforming metaphors can transform life,  welcome!

Add your voice to our community!

Gina